Choosing a financial adviser · South Africa

The advice fee increase you might never notice

Imagine an email from your financial adviser announcing a 20% increase in your annual fee. You would probably want a reason. Yet a portfolio rising from R5 million to R6 million can produce that increase without any change to the quoted percentage.

At 1% a year, including any applicable VAT, the annualised advice charge rises from R50,000 to R60,000. These are hypothetical snapshots at constant portfolio values, not actual invoices for a year during which the portfolio grew. Actual charges depend on the agreement, balances and billing dates.

The percentage looks reassuringly familiar. The price has moved.

In an EBnet interview, Subedra Reddy of NBC Holdings raised questions about fee visibility, asset growth and value. His discussion concerned retirement funds and trustees. The responsibilities differ from personal advice, but the demand for understandable rand costs belongs in both conversations.

For individual investors, the useful next step is an annual fee review that connects what was paid, why it changed and what the coming year could cost.

In this article

Watch the explanation

How Your Advice Fee Can Rise 20% Without a Higher Percentage

An unchanged advice percentage can still produce a higher rand bill. See how to reconcile actual charges, explain changes and assess the work covered.

6:59 · English · Optional captions available in the player

Read the video transcript

If your financial adviser told you that your annual fee was suddenly going up by 20%, you'd probably want to know exactly why. Yet the reality is that the actual amount you pay out of pocket can rise by exactly that much, all while the quoted percentage on your statement stays exactly the same. At a 1% annual fee, a portfolio worth 5 million rand produces an annualized advice charge of 50,000 rand.

Fast forward, and if that portfolio simply grows to 6 million rand, that exact same 1% fee now produces 60,000 rand. The percentage hasn't budged an inch, but the annualized rand amount you're paying is 10,000 rand higher. Now, there are a few important caveats to keep in mind here.

These are two hypothetical snapshots, each holding the portfolio value constant for the sake of the illustration. The 1% fee in our example includes any applicable VAT. It's important to note that these aren't actual invoices for a year in which a portfolio steadily grew from one value to the other.

Real charges will depend heavily on your specific agreement, the daily or monthly balances used, and your billing dates. This example is simply here to show how the price mechanics work. not to forecast what the markets will do. So when it comes to reviewing your actual costs, where should you start your line of questioning to get a handle on this?

Well, the best place to start is with the actual money you paid. Here's how you can break this down. First, request the total advice charge for the last 12 months in rand.

Ensure this includes any applicable VAT and any work that might have been billed separately. Next, compare that exact figure with the previous 12 months on the same basis. Finally, be sure to check for any once-off planning fees or other unique charges that won't recur, just so you know you're comparing apples to apples.

It's really tempting to take shortcuts when doing this math, but do not simply multiply today's portfolio value by your annual percentage and assume that was last year's bill. Why? Well, the provider may have used daily or monthly balances to calculate your fees, plus your own contributions and withdrawals throughout the year will completely change the true amount being charged.

Ask exactly which assets attract the fee and take the time to reconcile those figures directly to your statements and invoices. It's also vital to keep the different costs visible and distinct. Advice, investment management, platform administration, and product charges can often be separate costs, sometimes paid to entirely different providers.

By checking what each disclosure includes, you ensure you don't accidentally count the same charge twice. Remember, an advice fee is usually only one part of the total cost of your financial arrangements. Once you know exactly what you paid, your next question naturally should be about investigating exactly why that rand amount actually changed.

There are several possibilities to explore here. Was a higher percentage applied? Did the portfolio simply grow larger?

Was there additional work billed? Or perhaps a different tax treatment? Keep in mind, a contribution from your own savings can increase the assets being charged without any actual investment gain.

Rising markets can also increase the fee. But neither market growth nor deposits on their own tell you whether the actual advisory work increased. Of course, there may be perfectly valid reasons for a higher bill.

Major life events, like retirement, changing family responsibilities, or setting up more complicated arrangements can require substantial additional work from your adviser. Ask them what changed, what specific work was done, and whether that work was included in the ongoing service or agreed upon separately. A clear, honest explanation directly connects the price you pay to the specific responsibility your adviser has accepted.

Once you've looked back, it's time to look forward. Ask your adviser to run some scenarios, not market forecasts, but practical scenarios. What would the coming year's advice charge be if your portfolio stayed around its current value?

What would a planned contribution or a planned withdrawal change? How would higher or lower market values affect the upcoming fee? A percentage fee can certainly fall when assets fall, although you should be aware that minimum fees and other terms might affect your final result.

Because once the fees are crystal clear, the next critical question to ask is about measuring the true advice value you're receiving. How is that advice value actually measured? It's measured by the crucial decisions the advice helped you make.

Perhaps your retirement assumptions were carefully updated. A withdrawal plan was reviewed or specific agreed actions were successfully completed. Remember, more transactions don't automatically mean better advice.

Sometimes the absolute best advice means having someone explain exactly why a suitable existing investment should remain firmly in place. Beyond specific decisions, core value also includes intangible benefits, the experience you leverage, your access to expertise, and accountability. These things can't be measured strictly by the number of hours billed or meetings held.

However, portfolio growth alone doesn't prove that these benefits increased in the exact same proportion as your fees. Make sure to agree on what the coming year's service will actually include, so your next review has a concrete baseline to assess. If you decide you want to compare alternative fee structures, you have to ensure you're comparing the exact same scope of work.

Every model has its trade-offs, whether it's percentage fees, sliding scales, fixed retainers, project fees, or hourly charges. For instance, a fixed fee retainer can actually be quite expensive for a smaller portfolio. On the other hand, an hourly arrangement might make someone reluctant to pick up the phone and ask a truly useful question simply because they know the meter is running.

The lowest quote doesn't, by itself, establish the best fit for your specific needs. There's another logical approach to consider when evaluating your options. The capped fee solution.

Below the cap, the fee can still rise along with the assets being assessed. But above it, further asset growth doesn't increase that advice charge, provided the same cap and terms apply. ClearGauge offers capped ongoing advisory fees, so it explicitly has a commercial interest in this discussion.

Its caps are reviewed annually in March, while other provider charges remain completely separate. Always check the current schedule and the specific agreed terms. Before changing anything, be sure to clearly distinguish reviewing your advice arrangement from actually selling your investments.

Switching can trigger unintended transaction costs, tax consequences, or lost benefits. Always ask for a written summary of any proposed changes. Take your time to digest it, and carefully assess the consequences alongside the proposed fees.

Ultimately, the outcome of this review process may be to keep your current arrangement just as it is, to renegotiate it, or to seek a second opinion. What truly matters is that you can confidently explain what you paid, why it changed, and what you expect to receive moving forward. An unchanged percentage should never make the final rand amount invisible to you.

You can read the full article in the ClearGauge Financial Library, and if you'd like an independent written view of your own arrangements, explore the Financial Clarity Review. The exact scope and fee are agreed upon before any work begins and you can keep your existing adviser. ClearGauge wealth.

Advice before action.

Start with money actually paid

Ask for the total advice charge over the past twelve months in rand, including applicable VAT and any separately billed work. Compare it with the preceding twelve months on the same basis. Check whether either period includes an initial planning fee or another expense that will not recur.

Do not reconstruct the bill simply by multiplying the latest portfolio value by the annual percentage. Fees may have been calculated using daily or monthly balances. Contributions and withdrawals during the year affect the assets charged. The statement at year end cannot tell that whole story. Ask which assets attract the fee and why.

Keep advice separate from fund management, platform administration and other investment costs. Identify who received each amount. Reconcile the figures to statements and invoices, avoiding double counting where one disclosure already incorporates another charge.

Explain why the amount changed

Suppose the advice bill increased. How much came from a higher percentage, a larger balance, additional services or a change in tax treatment? Ask the adviser to explain those drivers rather than repeat the headline rate.

The distinction matters. A contribution from your savings can increase the fee without any investment gain. Rising markets can increase the assets charged even when performance disappoints against an appropriate benchmark. Neither establishes that the advice became more demanding.

Equally, a higher bill may reflect valuable additional work. A business sale, retirement or family change can substantially alter the assignment. An explanation should identify that work and show whether its cost was agreed separately or included in the ongoing service.

This makes the annual comparison useful. You can distinguish a price change, a change in the assets being charged and a change in what you bought. Each deserves its own explanation.

Put next year into rand

Ask for a forward estimate with its assumptions written down. What would the advice charge be if the portfolio stayed around its present value? What if you made a planned contribution or withdrawal? How would stronger or weaker markets affect it?

These are scenarios, not return forecasts. Their purpose is to reveal how the charging arrangement behaves before the next bill arrives. A rising portfolio is never guaranteed, and a percentage fee may fall when assets fall, depending on minimum fees and other terms.

For covered investment products, ASISA's Effective Annual Cost disclosure helps compare investment management, advice, administration and other charges over specified periods. It is useful alongside this exercise. Read the explanatory notes: a zero advice component can occur when the provider does not facilitate the adviser's charge. Separately paid advice still needs accounting for.

An EAC figure does not assess the quality of advice or replace an estimate of the rand bill under your agreement.

Connect the price to the work

The next part of the review needs more than arithmetic. What responsibility did the adviser take, and what decisions did the relationship help you make?

Useful evidence could include revised retirement assumptions, a considered withdrawal plan or progress on actions agreed at the previous review. Advice can also mean explaining why a suitable arrangement should remain unchanged. Trading merely to demonstrate activity gives clients a poor measure of service.

Nor should value be reduced to hours worked. Experience can make an important decision quicker and better. Continuing access, accountability and help during difficult markets can justify a substantial fee. A larger estate may bring greater complexity and responsibility.

But portfolio growth alone does not establish that any of those things increased proportionately. Where circumstances and service remain broadly similar, asking why the rand price keeps rising is reasonable.

The review should finish with an agreed description of the coming year's work. That gives the next discussion something concrete to assess beyond returns and the number of meetings held.

Read the alternative agreement

If the price seems out of line, compare arrangements for the same scope. A lower percentage or a sliding scale may be enough. A fixed retainer, project fee or hourly arrangement may fit the work better. Fixed fees can be expensive for smaller portfolios; hourly charges may discourage useful conversations.

A capped percentage fee places a ceiling on the advice charge for an agreed scope. Below the ceiling, the rand fee still grows with charged assets. Above it, further asset growth does not increase that charge while the terms remain unchanged. ClearGauge Wealth, the practice I founded, offers capped advice fees, which is relevant to my interest in this discussion.

Check minimum charges, excluded work, whether accounts are combined and how the cap is reviewed. Inflation or changes in complexity may justify a revision; the agreement should explain the process. An advice cap does not automatically cover platform or fund costs.

Finally, distinguish renegotiating advice from selling investments. Switching can bring transaction costs, tax consequences or lost benefits. A better fee arrangement should be assessed alongside those consequences.

A relationship worth reviewing

Request a concise written summary before the review meeting so you can consider the figures without feeling pressed to decide immediately.

A useful annual review leaves you able to explain your advice bill to someone else without reaching for a percentage. You know what left your investments or bank account, why the total changed and what you expect to receive next.

The answer may justify retaining the current arrangement. It may reveal a price worth renegotiating or a service that no longer fits. Either outcome is more useful than treating an unchanged rate as evidence that nothing has changed.

When your portfolio grows, read the advice bill too. A familiar percentage should never make the rand amount invisible.

For the broader cost comparison, read How much should financial advice cost in South Africa? Explore ClearGauge’s current rates and caps with the advisory fee calculator, or use the second-opinion guide to consider your next step.

Source note

EBnet interview. “The fee question – how dare you?!”, with Subedra Reddy of NBC Holdings, 29 September 2026. Relevant discussion: 2:10–4:49 and 7:22–11:40.

ASISA Retail Standard on Effective Annual Cost. Updated 16 April 2025. Sections 1.3, 5.1–5.4 and 6.6 support the cost comparison and advice disclosure discussion.

Hypothetical calculations: R5,000,000 × 1% = R50,000; R6,000,000 × 1% = R60,000; (R60,000 ÷ R50,000) − 1 = 20%. The article is general educational commentary, not personal financial, investment or tax advice.

Keep the question in context

Explore the choosing a financial adviser collection